|
Teacher Leadership Project
The Teacher Leadership Project is a
requirement for all teacher education students at Midway College. Through
this project, the student will research an educational topic related to
their content area of emphasis and present their findings.
All work is to be done in APA format
(please see the current APA Handbook or visit:
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/01/
for more details on APA formatting). All work should be double-spaced,
completed in Arial or Times New Roman, 12-point font.
The timetable for the Teacher
Leadership Project is as follows:
Step 1:
The Proposal
The candidate will propose a topic to his/her advisor prior to
Checkpoint I. This topic should be given considerable thought, as it will be
the basis for a long-term project. The topic must relate to the student’s
content area of emphasis (English/Communication, Mathematics, Social
Science, Science, or Arts and Humanities) to show understanding of that
content and the pedagogical application of this content in the classroom.
The proposal should be 250 words in length and downloaded onto LiveText. The
advisor must approve the topic chosen. Once approved, the candidate will
develop and present a proposal at Checkpoint I. The Checkpoint 1 team may
offer recommendations, changes and feedback on the proposal requiring the
candidate to do further research into the chosen topic before finalizing the
proposal.
Step II:
Review of Literature/Research
After Checkpoint I, the candidate should begin collecting and reading
relevant books, and professional journals on the proposed topic. The review
of literature/research section should be no less than five pages long. This
section is not a position paper; it should be written in third person.
Include the References section in this submission (see below). The candidate
will present the review of literature at Checkpoint II.
Step
III: Reflection and Final Submission
If possible, the candidate should implement a strategy or idea found in
the review of literature during student teaching. If it is not possible to
implement a strategy or idea from the review of literature, the candidate
should reflect on how this strategy COULD be implemented in his/her own
classroom. The final Teacher Leadership Project will be presented orally at
Checkpoint III.
The layout of the Teacher Leadership
Project should be as follows:
Title Page
Table of Contents
Introduction
Review of Literature (to be completed at Checkpoint II)
Implementation
Reflection
References
The Title Page is one page and
should be written as APA requires.
The Table of Contents should list
all of the sections of the Teacher Leadership Project as APA requires.
The Introduction should be 1 to 2
pages in length, giving the reader an overview of the entire project. It
should be written last.
The Review of Literature section
should be no less than five pages in length. This section is not a position
paper, and should be written in third person. There should be no “I” in this
section. It is an overview of the current research on the topic chosen.
The Implementation section is an
explanation of how the student teacher implemented the strategy or idea from
the research in the classroom or how it will be implemented in his or her
own classroom later. In addition, any data collected should be included in
this section. This section should be 1-2 pages in length, not including
charts or graphs. .
The Reflection section should be 2
to 3 pages in length, in which the candidate reflects upon the
implementation (or anticipated implementation) of the strategy or idea. The
candidate could consider what went well, what she/he would do differently
next time, and how the students reacted and performed if the strategy is
implemented.
The References section should
include all cited sources from the Teacher Leadership Project, written in
APA format. Only sources that have been cited in the paper should be
included in this section. There should be at least two sources for each page
in the Review of Literature section.
Rubric for Teacher Leadership Project
|
Category |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
|
Topic |
Candidate identifies a topic that is rigorous,
specific and relevant and able to be implemented to a degree in the
classroom. |
Candidate identifies a topic that is mostly
rigorous, specific and relevant and able to be implemented to a
degree in the classroom. |
Candidate identifies a topic that is somewhat
rigorous, specific and relevant and able to be implemented to a
degree in the classroom. |
Candidate identifies a topic that is not
rigorous, specific or relevant or is not able to be implemented to a
degree in the classroom. |
|
Depth and Clarity |
Depth, appropriateness and clarity of research is
appropriate for college level work. Sources support category 1
above. |
Research is not as in depth as it should be for
college level work, sources may not be peer reviewed. Sources
somewhat support category 1 above. |
Research is not clear. Not
enough research was completed.
Sources only support category 1 above. |
Research is not appropriate for college level
work. Sources are not peer reviewed, information is not clarified
and applied to content of paper. Sources do not support category 1
above. |
|
APA format and mechanics |
APA format, grammar and mechanics are 100%
correct |
Few (1-2) errors in APA format, grammar
or mechanics. |
Some (3-4) errors in APA format, grammar
or mechanics. |
More than 4 errors in APA format, grammar or
mechanics. |
|